Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34161 - 34170 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 34161 - 34170 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals from an order denying his motion to “quash” or “vacate” the DNA surcharge that was imposed when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59174 - 2011-01-24
, appeals from an order denying his motion to “quash” or “vacate” the DNA surcharge that was imposed when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59174 - 2011-01-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Edward Thomas Nisiewicz, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Edward Thomas Nisiewicz, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Anthony Maurice Bell appeals an order denying Bell’s motion for sentence modification. Bell contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105288 - 2013-12-04
. Anthony Maurice Bell appeals an order denying Bell’s motion for sentence modification. Bell contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105288 - 2013-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for plea withdrawal.[1] Broomfield contends that he should have been allowed to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91093 - 2013-01-02
motion for plea withdrawal.[1] Broomfield contends that he should have been allowed to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91093 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
orders of the circuit court that denied his motion to withdraw his plea and his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76554 - 2012-01-17
orders of the circuit court that denied his motion to withdraw his plea and his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76554 - 2012-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(d) (2007-08).[1] The circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
postconviction motion filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(d) (2007-08).[1] The circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Covington, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his postconviction motion filed pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47006 - 2014-09-15
. Covington, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his postconviction motion filed pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47006 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08)[1] motion, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47459 - 2010-03-01
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08)[1] motion, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47459 - 2010-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marius A. Battle, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74177 - 2014-09-15
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marius A. Battle, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74177 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing Prude’s latest postconviction motion. We agree with the circuit court that the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2015-02-16
without a hearing Prude’s latest postconviction motion. We agree with the circuit court that the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2015-02-16