Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34171 - 34180 of 82610 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34171 - 34180 of 82610 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case arose out of an incident in which Vega stabbed another inmate with a scissors blade, puncturing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
in this case arose out of an incident in which Vega stabbed another inmate with a scissors blade, puncturing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 70
2009 WI APP 70 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1703
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36138 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 70 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1703
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36138 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Dodge v. Curtis E. Dittberner
that under the facts of this case his detention by the use of physical force was an arrest. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16167 - 2017-09-21
that under the facts of this case his detention by the use of physical force was an arrest. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16167 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kelli T-G. v. Gerald A. Charland
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8654 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Tina Harmon v. City of Milwaukee
. In January 1996, Tina’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was denied. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13045 - 2017-09-21
. In January 1996, Tina’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was denied. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13045 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
). Consequently, in this case, we use the phrase “issue preclusion,” including, we note, where federal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27228 - 2014-09-15
). Consequently, in this case, we use the phrase “issue preclusion,” including, we note, where federal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27228 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael J. Jordan
mistrial motion was based on the prosecutor’s contention that she could not put on a rebuttal case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6508 - 2005-03-31
mistrial motion was based on the prosecutor’s contention that she could not put on a rebuttal case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6508 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently pled guilty. DISCUSSION ¶5 The issue in this case is whether Lord was lawfully seized when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35212 - 2009-01-12
subsequently pled guilty. DISCUSSION ¶5 The issue in this case is whether Lord was lawfully seized when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35212 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
). This requirement is easily satisfied in this case because Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4) (2005-06), states that a witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
). This requirement is easily satisfied in this case because Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4) (2005-06), states that a witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Davies
cases dealing with judicial substitution. However, the time limits for substitution in a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21
cases dealing with judicial substitution. However, the time limits for substitution in a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21

