Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34181 - 34190 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34181 - 34190 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postverdict motions. First American challenges certain rulings made by the circuit court prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88089 - 2014-09-15
postverdict motions. First American challenges certain rulings made by the circuit court prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88089 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2011–12) postconviction motion.[1] He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117602 - 2014-07-22
. § 974.06 (2011–12) postconviction motion.[1] He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117602 - 2014-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
. The circuit court ruled for the Jantes on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.[1] It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35704 - 2009-05-11
. The circuit court ruled for the Jantes on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.[1] It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35704 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20)1 postconviction motion to vacate his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393020 - 2021-07-20
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20)1 postconviction motion to vacate his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393020 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
Robert P. Lunke v. Village of Bangor
of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary judgment against Robert Lunke and dismissing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15761 - 2017-09-21
of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary judgment against Robert Lunke and dismissing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15761 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Perry M. Ankerson v. EPIK Corporation
and moved to intervene as a defendant. Its motion was granted on May 13, 2002. EPIK remained in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7231 - 2017-09-20
and moved to intervene as a defendant. Its motion was granted on May 13, 2002. EPIK remained in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7231 - 2017-09-20
Robert P. Lunke v. Village of Bangor
. ¶1 VERGERONT, J. The Village of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15761 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 VERGERONT, J. The Village of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 43
. The Honorable Rebecca F. Dallet issued the order denying McDougle’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93591 - 2014-09-15
. The Honorable Rebecca F. Dallet issued the order denying McDougle’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that Mendoza returned the fire. ¶3 Prior to trial, the State filed a motion to admit other-acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294245 - 2020-10-06
and that Mendoza returned the fire. ¶3 Prior to trial, the State filed a motion to admit other-acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294245 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
, counsel refused to file such a motion, because he believed that doing so would be imprudent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7439 - 2017-09-20
, counsel refused to file such a motion, because he believed that doing so would be imprudent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7439 - 2017-09-20