Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
. The circuit court ruled for the Jantes on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.[1] It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35704 - 2009-05-11
. The circuit court ruled for the Jantes on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.[1] It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35704 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20)1 postconviction motion to vacate his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393020 - 2021-07-20
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20)1 postconviction motion to vacate his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393020 - 2021-07-20
Robert P. Lunke v. Village of Bangor
. ¶1 VERGERONT, J. The Village of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15761 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 VERGERONT, J. The Village of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15761 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor Marshall Kennedy
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. In his § 974.06 motion, Kennedy claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7092 - 2005-03-31
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. In his § 974.06 motion, Kennedy claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert P. Lunke v. Village of Bangor
of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary judgment against Robert Lunke and dismissing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15761 - 2017-09-21
of Bangor appeals orders denying its motion for summary judgment against Robert Lunke and dismissing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15761 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Lewis Flynn
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
to HSBC and the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58403 - 2014-09-15
to HSBC and the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence on the ground that law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916423 - 2025-02-18
that the circuit court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence on the ground that law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916423 - 2025-02-18
[PDF]
Perry M. Ankerson v. EPIK Corporation
and moved to intervene as a defendant. Its motion was granted on May 13, 2002. EPIK remained in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7231 - 2017-09-20
and moved to intervene as a defendant. Its motion was granted on May 13, 2002. EPIK remained in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7231 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
in part First American’s postverdict motions. First American challenges certain rulings made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88089 - 2012-12-02
in part First American’s postverdict motions. First American challenges certain rulings made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88089 - 2012-12-02