Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
that under the plea agreement, “[i]f needed London Dabney would testify consistently with the statement he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
that under the plea agreement, “[i]f needed London Dabney would testify consistently with the statement he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
U.S. 420, 436-39 (1984). If a detention is illegal and violates the Fourth Amendment, all statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
U.S. 420, 436-39 (1984). If a detention is illegal and violates the Fourth Amendment, all statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
exemption set out in Wis. Stat. § 815.20(1).[5] Megal points to the Dewsnup statement that the benefit
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1239 - 2003-06-01
exemption set out in Wis. Stat. § 815.20(1).[5] Megal points to the Dewsnup statement that the benefit
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1239 - 2003-06-01
CA Blank Order
goals for Wis. Stat. chs. 302 to 304. The fact that such a broad statement of purpose does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
goals for Wis. Stat. chs. 302 to 304. The fact that such a broad statement of purpose does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 30, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
statement offered by Bauer’s former spouse. At the close of the contempt hearing, the circuit court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86601 - 2010-02-16
statement offered by Bauer’s former spouse. At the close of the contempt hearing, the circuit court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86601 - 2010-02-16
COURT OF APPEALS
: unlike Seibel, Smith admitted he had been drinking and gave inconsistent statements to the police about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2005-03-31
: unlike Seibel, Smith admitted he had been drinking and gave inconsistent statements to the police about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that counsel did not have a witness to call to establish a prior inconsistent statement. ¶6 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
, and that counsel did not have a witness to call to establish a prior inconsistent statement. ¶6 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
State v. Brandon E. Jones
Jones. At the hearing, Jones’s attorney and Jones himself presented statements to the court concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20077 - 2006-01-09
Jones. At the hearing, Jones’s attorney and Jones himself presented statements to the court concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20077 - 2006-01-09
Certification
325, 782 N.W.2d 682 (court of appeals may not “dismiss a statement in a prior case from [the supreme
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2005-03-31
325, 782 N.W.2d 682 (court of appeals may not “dismiss a statement in a prior case from [the supreme
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Upchurch
intimates that this information was somehow inconsistent with the younger brother’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15936 - 2005-03-31
intimates that this information was somehow inconsistent with the younger brother’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15936 - 2005-03-31