Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 73377 for ha.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 73377 for ha.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶5 “The benchmark for judging whether counsel has acted ineffectively is stated in Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34815 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 “The benchmark for judging whether counsel has acted ineffectively is stated in Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34815 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sturtevant, WI 53177-0900 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195933 - 2017-09-21
Sturtevant, WI 53177-0900 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195933 - 2017-09-21
State v. Amado V. Saldana, Jr.
these offenses. Not consuming alcohol was a condition of his bail. In addition, Saldana has a lengthy criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31
these offenses. Not consuming alcohol was a condition of his bail. In addition, Saldana has a lengthy criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C.P.
. The judgment is affirmed. The underlying facts are undisputed. Phillip has been paying $205 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21
. The judgment is affirmed. The underlying facts are undisputed. Phillip has been paying $205 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darrell Cage
is not a witness in a trial. We further note that Cage has failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8524 - 2005-03-31
is not a witness in a trial. We further note that Cage has failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the defendant has established the existence of a new factor, the trial court must determine whether that “‘new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30159 - 2014-09-15
the defendant has established the existence of a new factor, the trial court must determine whether that “‘new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2018AP1057-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231599 - 2019-01-02
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2018AP1057-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231599 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop of a vehicle for a noncriminal traffic violation if the officer has reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74803 - 2014-09-15
stop of a vehicle for a noncriminal traffic violation if the officer has reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has entered the following opinion and order: 2023AP471-CR State of Wisconsin v. Roosevelt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
has entered the following opinion and order: 2023AP471-CR State of Wisconsin v. Roosevelt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
53202 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20
53202 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20