Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 74552 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Gabreon J. Stone
of the offender; and (3) the need for protection of the public. State v. Sarabia, 118 Wis.2d 655, 673, 348 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9570 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of La Crosse v. Neil Collins
that in preparing the map the objective was to have a document that could be used for publication, distribution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13137 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael I.
in circumstances justifying a child support revision because Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(13)(i),[1] excludes public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15482 - 2005-03-31

Terry Kinderman v. The Village of Redgranite
of the property for public purposes.” Yegen v. City of Bismarck, 291 N.W.2d 422, 427 (N.D. 1980) (holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4434 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
and the corresponding Marinette County procedural rule requiring the publication of notice and two- thirds county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5268 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael I.
revision because WIS. ADM. CODE § HSS 80.02(13)(i),1 excludes public assistance when determining gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Geoffrey Chapman
)). Thus, law enforcement “may approach citizens in public spaces and ask them questions without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4333 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Michael Montey v. Steve's on Bluemound
a proprietor “has a duty to exercise ordinary care to protect members of the public while on the premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15663 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas A. Fadner
misconduct involved his billing practices to the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) and mishandling
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21510 - 2006-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment. Finally, Mark argues that the circuit court’s decision should be overturned on public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33178 - 2008-06-25