Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 9858 for WA 08.

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
parte communication between a party and a judge? 08/14/2019 REVW Affirmed 06/16/2020 2020 WI 56
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275407 - 2020-07-31

[PDF] WI App 16
or more OWI offenses,1 the PAC that applied to him was only .02, not .08 as it is for most drivers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254423 - 2020-04-27

COURT OF APPEALS
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(a) (2007-08). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02

COURT OF APPEALS
we conclude that Wis. Stat. § 846.16(1) (2007-08)[1] did not require the sheriff to serve Panenka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56674 - 2010-11-16

[PDF] NOTICE
-08).1 We agree with the State, however, that neither the CAD printout nor the shell casing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58884 - 2014-09-15

Rule Order
. No. 13-08 In the matter of the petition of the State Bar of Wisconsin proposing revisions to SCR
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115436 - 2014-06-23

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
court’s factual findings unless they are “clearly erroneous.” Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (2007-08).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57895 - 2011-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
of this really was from its inception all the way through November of ’08. That is when the defendant had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106567 - 2014-01-14

[PDF] NOTICE
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54587 - 2014-09-15

Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
that the circuit court erred in finding that this was a course of conduct. In Id. Bachowski, 139 Wis. 2d at 407-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05