Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 69847 for as he.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 69847 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Adolescent Treatment Unit. In 1980, he was transferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084604 - 2026-03-04
Adolescent Treatment Unit. In 1980, he was transferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084604 - 2026-03-04
State v. Michael O. Thomas
. § 947.01, and from the trial court’s order dying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
. § 947.01, and from the trial court’s order dying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Arnold
to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Easton
intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence grounded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence grounded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that he was on patrol when he received a call that there had been a shooting at a house. When he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
that he was on patrol when he received a call that there had been a shooting at a house. When he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David J. Arnold
was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3862 - 2017-09-20
was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3862 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
contained a disclaimer waiving any liability Grunwald may have had for damage caused by fire. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28754 - 2007-04-23
contained a disclaimer waiving any liability Grunwald may have had for damage caused by fire. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28754 - 2007-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, asserting that he had not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
, asserting that he had not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
State v. Xavier J. Rockette
First, he mounts a Confrontation Clause challenge, under the authority of Crawford v. Washington, 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27
First, he mounts a Confrontation Clause challenge, under the authority of Crawford v. Washington, 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Xavier J. Rockette
First, he mounts a Confrontation Clause challenge, under the authority of Crawford v. Washington, 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25320 - 2017-09-21
First, he mounts a Confrontation Clause challenge, under the authority of Crawford v. Washington, 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25320 - 2017-09-21