Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 62360 for child support.
State v. Kimberly B.
supported Kimberly’s conviction for intentionally causing bodily harm to a child, contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17981 - 2005-07-06
supported Kimberly’s conviction for intentionally causing bodily harm to a child, contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17981 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
Brown County v. Shannon R.
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 3 and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7517 - 2017-09-19
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 3 and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7517 - 2017-09-19
Brown County v. Shannon R.
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act,[3] and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act,[3] and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Shannon R.
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act,[3] and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7516 - 2005-03-31
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act,[3] and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Shannon R.
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 3 and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7516 - 2017-09-19
. Accordingly, the boys are “Indian children” under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 3 and the additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7516 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and a judgment of conviction on two misdemeanor counts of sexual intercourse with a child as a repeat offender.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
and a judgment of conviction on two misdemeanor counts of sexual intercourse with a child as a repeat offender.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
counts of sexual intercourse with a child as a repeat offender.2 On appeal, Godwin contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53008 - 2014-09-15
counts of sexual intercourse with a child as a repeat offender.2 On appeal, Godwin contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53008 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assault of a child and one count of exposing a child to harmful materials. He also appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
assault of a child and one count of exposing a child to harmful materials. He also appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
totality of the testimony does not support the conclusion that the child sustained ‘full penetration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21
totality of the testimony does not support the conclusion that the child sustained ‘full penetration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-degree sexual assault of a child. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09
-degree sexual assault of a child. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09