Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 40045 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 40045 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Thomas G. Henkel
occurred, and this was what he testified to, and what his attorney argued in his opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3194 - 2005-03-31
occurred, and this was what he testified to, and what his attorney argued in his opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Slaughter
5 THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Sharp, is that a correct statement of the agreement? MR. SHARP: That’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13622 - 2017-09-21
5 THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Sharp, is that a correct statement of the agreement? MR. SHARP: That’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13622 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce J. Kuechler
sentenced to pay a fine. ¶3 In the court’s sentencing statement, it concluded that a maximum term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2005-03-31
sentenced to pay a fine. ¶3 In the court’s sentencing statement, it concluded that a maximum term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas G. Henkel
he testified to, and what his attorney argued in his opening statement. However, this defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3194 - 2017-09-19
he testified to, and what his attorney argued in his opening statement. However, this defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3194 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bruce J. Kuechler
sentenced to pay a fine. ¶3 In the court’s sentencing statement, it concluded that a maximum term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5225 - 2017-09-19
sentenced to pay a fine. ¶3 In the court’s sentencing statement, it concluded that a maximum term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5225 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
alternative treatment or procedure. However, the [doctor’s] duty to inform does not require disclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30
alternative treatment or procedure. However, the [doctor’s] duty to inform does not require disclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
not require disclosure of: (1) Information beyond what a reasonably well-qualified physician in a similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62023 - 2014-09-15
not require disclosure of: (1) Information beyond what a reasonably well-qualified physician in a similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62023 - 2014-09-15
Vernon Seay v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
disclosure. Id. The Commission concluded that Seay's March 29, 1989 letter and July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8777 - 2005-03-31
disclosure. Id. The Commission concluded that Seay's March 29, 1989 letter and July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vernon Seay v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
made a protected disclosure. Id. The Commission concluded that Seay's March 29, 1989 letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8777 - 2017-09-19
made a protected disclosure. Id. The Commission concluded that Seay's March 29, 1989 letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8777 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and bank account statements to support portions of her testimony. ¶10 The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219144 - 2018-09-19
and bank account statements to support portions of her testimony. ¶10 The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219144 - 2018-09-19