Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 6667 for mix.

COURT OF APPEALS
of ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12

COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient facts entitling him to a hearing is subject to a mixed standard of review. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70312 - 2011-08-29

[PDF] Maryland Casualty Company v. Evan Ben-Hur
an action, is a mixed question of fact and law. Stoll v. Adriansen, 122 Wis.2d 503, 513, 362 N.W.2d 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8272 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to a mixed standard of review. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111198 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company v. Thomas P. Brass
a covenant not to compete comports with the requirements of WIS. STAT. § 103.465 is a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3103 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conceivable. Id. at 693. Ineffective assistance claims present mixed questions of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335496 - 2021-02-17

[PDF] State v. Terry G. Betts
a good mix of men and women. Appellate counsel points out that the trial court excluded evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8868 - 2017-09-19

Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
to deal fairly with individual shareholders is a mixed question of fact and law. See Reget v. Paige, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2822 - 2005-03-31

Winnebago County Department of Health & Human Services v. Diane L.M.
of ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v. O’Brien, 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7628 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
II. A. ¶10 “A [trial] court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence presents a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27555 - 2014-09-15