Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
State v. Sebastian "Frank" Bustamante
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ismet D. Divanovic
right to be present at all critical stages of the trial court proceedings, (2) he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
right to be present at all critical stages of the trial court proceedings, (2) he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lisimba Love
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the resulting self incriminating custodial statement used against him [or her] at trial,” means that Mack S.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
the resulting self incriminating custodial statement used against him [or her] at trial,” means that Mack S.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Lee Norman Brown
of counsel. He claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequately discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14656 - 2017-09-21
of counsel. He claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequately discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14656 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gale Johnson
a judgment of conviction, claiming that the trial court erred in denying his motions for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15677 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction, claiming that the trial court erred in denying his motions for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15677 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Benion
for operating a motor vehicle after revocation. He claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10026 - 2005-03-31
for operating a motor vehicle after revocation. He claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10026 - 2005-03-31