Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 58511 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Lisimba Love
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
) (2007-08).[2] Harris takes issue with the trial court’s decision to allow into evidence testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53412 - 2010-08-16

[PDF] State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19

State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the resulting self incriminating custodial statement used against him [or her] at trial,” means that Mack S.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07

[PDF] State v. Gale Johnson
Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction, claiming that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15677 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Paula L. Moebius v. General Casualty Insurance Co.
a larger award or a new trial. We conclude that she is entitled to neither, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9998 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing the maximum available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27381 - 2006-12-11

Paula L. Moebius v. General Casualty Insurance Co.
damage award, she seeks by appeal either a larger award or a new trial. We conclude that she is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9998 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary L. Benion
for operating a motor vehicle after revocation. He claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10026 - 2005-03-31