Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
offense, contrary to §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.48, Stats. Lamont contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
offense, contrary to §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.48, Stats. Lamont contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
to §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.48, STATS. Lamont contends that the trial court erred by failing to grant him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
to §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.48, STATS. Lamont contends that the trial court erred by failing to grant him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
He claims that the circuit court erroneously denied him a new trial or, alternatively, sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385749 - 2021-07-13
He claims that the circuit court erroneously denied him a new trial or, alternatively, sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385749 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) the trial court erred by failing to give the castle doctrine jury instruction; (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504215 - 2022-04-05
that: (1) the trial court erred by failing to give the castle doctrine jury instruction; (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504215 - 2022-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
procedural and substantive grounds, and we decline to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117597 - 2014-07-21
procedural and substantive grounds, and we decline to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117597 - 2014-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the trial court on April 12, 2010, denying his motion to modify maintenance and finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61910 - 2011-03-29
in the trial court on April 12, 2010, denying his motion to modify maintenance and finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61910 - 2011-03-29
State v. Tyshion D. Davis
a consolidated postconviction order summarily denying his resentencing motion. The issues are whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26565 - 2006-09-25
a consolidated postconviction order summarily denying his resentencing motion. The issues are whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26565 - 2006-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2013AP2384 2 affirm on both procedural and substantive grounds, and we decline to order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP2384 2 affirm on both procedural and substantive grounds, and we decline to order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered in the trial court on April 12, 2010, denying his motion to modify No. 2010AP1665-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61910 - 2014-09-15
entered in the trial court on April 12, 2010, denying his motion to modify No. 2010AP1665-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61910 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 24, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of fleeing and eluding an officer and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138251 - 2015-03-23
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of fleeing and eluding an officer and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138251 - 2015-03-23