Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34201 - 34210 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34201 - 34210 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
State v. Ignacio P. Gonzalez
the protection of Wisconsin’s roads, the trial court failed to consider case law precedent which held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31
the protection of Wisconsin’s roads, the trial court failed to consider case law precedent which held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15019 - 2005-03-31
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15019 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marco A. Villa
been a witness in a case? Dean Gitzlaff made no response to these questions and was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13051 - 2017-09-21
been a witness in a case? Dean Gitzlaff made no response to these questions and was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13051 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State charged Long with OWI-tenth, that case was dismissed after the preliminary hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651823 - 2023-05-03
the State charged Long with OWI-tenth, that case was dismissed after the preliminary hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651823 - 2023-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its case, Nelson thrice confirmed her desire to testify on her own behalf. During a colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101620 - 2017-09-21
its case, Nelson thrice confirmed her desire to testify on her own behalf. During a colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101620 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
and verse, all the many cases in this state where either we or our supreme court found facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51937 - 2014-09-15
and verse, all the many cases in this state where either we or our supreme court found facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51937 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jonathan Owens
2006 WI App 75 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2005AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21652 - 2006-04-25
2006 WI App 75 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2005AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21652 - 2006-04-25
City of Muskego v. Arthur D. Dyer
reveal any bias or prejudice in the case. Id. at 717. During voir dire, potential juror D indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4593 - 2005-03-31
reveal any bias or prejudice in the case. Id. at 717. During voir dire, potential juror D indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4593 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15