Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34201 - 34210 of 46051 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 34201 - 34210 of 46051 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(citing United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 552 (1980)). The operative test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843225 - 2024-08-28
(citing United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 552 (1980)). The operative test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843225 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1984). The defendant must prove both prongs of this test or the claim fails. Id. In our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
(1984). The defendant must prove both prongs of this test or the claim fails. Id. In our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings are entitled to substantial deference under the substantial evidence test if reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50672 - 2010-06-07
factual findings are entitled to substantial deference under the substantial evidence test if reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50672 - 2010-06-07
State v. Thomas Deffke
of his sentence. “The test for determining whether a sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
of his sentence. “The test for determining whether a sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott E. Brandstetter
the same test No. 03-0755-CR 6 as Anderson to a different set of facts. Those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6293 - 2017-09-19
the same test No. 03-0755-CR 6 as Anderson to a different set of facts. Those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6293 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). Reasonable suspicion is a commonsense, nontechnical test. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
omitted). Reasonable suspicion is a commonsense, nontechnical test. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an objective “means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility.” See id., ¶42 (internal quotation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
an objective “means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility.” See id., ¶42 (internal quotation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
told the officer he used the item to smoke marijuana, and an on-site test confirmed the presence of THC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135547 - 2015-02-24
told the officer he used the item to smoke marijuana, and an on-site test confirmed the presence of THC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135547 - 2015-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the interest of justice test should not have been applied here in the first place, suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
contends that the interest of justice test should not have been applied here in the first place, suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
[PDF]
State v. Warren J. Hampton
Wis. 2d 38, 644 N.W.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26265 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 38, 644 N.W.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26265 - 2017-09-21