Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34201 - 34210 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 34201 - 34210 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the fees claimed. ¶4 In January 2013, the parties agreed to settle the issues in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
of the fees claimed. ¶4 In January 2013, the parties agreed to settle the issues in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We review questions of law independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4798 - 2005-03-31
of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We review questions of law independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4798 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
cases all testified that there was no agreement between Conner and the State when Conner testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
cases all testified that there was no agreement between Conner and the State when Conner testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court dismissed the case in its entirety, concluding that the doctrine of judicial estoppel barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
, the circuit court dismissed the case in its entirety, concluding that the doctrine of judicial estoppel barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial. This case came down to whether the jury believed that Jones engaged in sexual contact/conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
of the trial. This case came down to whether the jury believed that Jones engaged in sexual contact/conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7748 - 2012-03-01
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7748 - 2012-03-01
Waukesha County v. Albert A. Tadych
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7761 - 2013-10-10
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7761 - 2013-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Jose Trevino
that § 972.11(2)(b) is unconstitutional as applied in this case in that his Sixth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12630 - 2017-09-21
that § 972.11(2)(b) is unconstitutional as applied in this case in that his Sixth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ernie Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha County
2002 WI App 164 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0952-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 164 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0952-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cheryl L. Welsch
withhold sentence or impose sentence under s. 973.15 and stay its execution, and in either case place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9268 - 2005-03-31
withhold sentence or impose sentence under s. 973.15 and stay its execution, and in either case place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9268 - 2005-03-31