Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 69399 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. Hein argues he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2008-04-14
postconviction motion for a new trial. Hein argues he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2008-04-14
Frederick Spivey, Jr. v. William G. Otto
that he conspired with the Schalmos to facilitate their fraud upon the Spiveys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8264 - 2005-03-31
that he conspired with the Schalmos to facilitate their fraud upon the Spiveys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8264 - 2005-03-31
08AP392 State v. Thomas R. Beninghaus.doc
officer when he was reading the Informing the Accused form caused him to submit to the chemical test after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12
officer when he was reading the Informing the Accused form caused him to submit to the chemical test after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
uncounseled OWI convictions for sentencing purposes). Specifically, Johnson claimed that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193954 - 2017-09-21
uncounseled OWI convictions for sentencing purposes). Specifically, Johnson claimed that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193954 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronnie C. Barnes
a judgment entered after he pled no contest to attempted burglary, contrary to §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
a judgment entered after he pled no contest to attempted burglary, contrary to §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). He also contends the court’s ineligibility determination constitutes a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141395 - 2017-09-21
). He also contends the court’s ineligibility determination constitutes a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141395 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lamont Williams
of postconviction counsel. He argues that he is entitled to a sentence modification because of an alleged change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31
of postconviction counsel. He argues that he is entitled to a sentence modification because of an alleged change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Petrie argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of count one. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85971 - 2012-08-13
postconviction motion. Petrie argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of count one. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85971 - 2012-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
be liable as party to the crime of armed robbery “even though he or she did not actually know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26
be liable as party to the crime of armed robbery “even though he or she did not actually know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
was later convicted. He appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Upon review of a motion to suppress, we will sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6973 - 2017-09-20
was later convicted. He appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Upon review of a motion to suppress, we will sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6973 - 2017-09-20