Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 57351 for id.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sometimes constitute a sufficient reason for not raising that claim in an earlier proceeding. Id. at 682
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031855 - 2025-11-04
sometimes constitute a sufficient reason for not raising that claim in an earlier proceeding. Id. at 682
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031855 - 2025-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
, the need to prevent further delinquent acts, and the juvenile’s need for care and treatment.” Id., ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59079 - 2011-01-18
, the need to prevent further delinquent acts, and the juvenile’s need for care and treatment.” Id., ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59079 - 2011-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
court satisfy applicable constitutional provisions. See id. DISCUSSION ¶6 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144880 - 2015-07-22
court satisfy applicable constitutional provisions. See id. DISCUSSION ¶6 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144880 - 2015-07-22
Kathryn M. Leute v. Robert L. Leute
minimum contact is therefore necessary to obtain jurisdiction under it. Id. at 653, 485 N.W.2d at 72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8600 - 2005-03-31
minimum contact is therefore necessary to obtain jurisdiction under it. Id. at 653, 485 N.W.2d at 72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8600 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99746 - 2013-07-22
a new factor is a question of law that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99746 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
Town of Grafton v. City of Cedarburg
. See id. This court decides questions of law independently, without deference to the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25814 - 2017-09-21
. See id. This court decides questions of law independently, without deference to the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25814 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul M. Way
of rebutting that presumption. See id. In exercising its discretion, the trial court considers the gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13868 - 2014-09-15
of rebutting that presumption. See id. In exercising its discretion, the trial court considers the gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13868 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
first have to develop them.” Id. at 647. We will not do so; this court cannot serve as both advocate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174370 - 2017-09-21
first have to develop them.” Id. at 647. We will not do so; this court cannot serve as both advocate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
error, the outcome of the proceeding would have been different. See id. at 694. ¶9 An attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33031 - 2014-09-15
error, the outcome of the proceeding would have been different. See id. at 694. ¶9 An attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33031 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
performance is whether “counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28
performance is whether “counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28