Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 82619 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 82619 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. Joan Schmitz
directly, indirectly, by telephone or mail or through other individuals.” The bond order contained similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
directly, indirectly, by telephone or mail or through other individuals.” The bond order contained similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Rutzinski
1 A defendant may appeal from an order denying a motion to suppress evidence even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14890 - 2017-09-21
1 A defendant may appeal from an order denying a motion to suppress evidence even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
" ordering the DOJ to take certain actions to remedy its violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 230.80-.89. ¶18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158428 - 2017-09-21
" ordering the DOJ to take certain actions to remedy its violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 230.80-.89. ¶18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158428 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
L. MILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45985 - 2014-09-15
L. MILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45985 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Certification
argument, reasoning that “the statute merely sets a maximum time period” and that the test for timeliness
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204845 - 2017-12-13
argument, reasoning that “the statute merely sets a maximum time period” and that the test for timeliness
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204845 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February
(headquartered in Wausau), which reversed an order of the Washburn County Circuit Court, Judge Robert H
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919 - 2017-09-20
(headquartered in Wausau), which reversed an order of the Washburn County Circuit Court, Judge Robert H
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259967 - 2020-05-12
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259967 - 2020-05-12
State v. Rickey Gray
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: richard j. sankovitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3850 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: richard j. sankovitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3850 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rickey Gray
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: RICHARD J. SANKOVITZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3850 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: RICHARD J. SANKOVITZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3850 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
AND ANTHONY HUNTOON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34227 - 2014-09-15
AND ANTHONY HUNTOON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34227 - 2014-09-15