Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 34221 - 34230 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
called the girls’ therapist, Wendy Herrick, as part of its case-in-chief. During redirect examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263152 - 2020-06-10
called the girls’ therapist, Wendy Herrick, as part of its case-in-chief. During redirect examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263152 - 2020-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
informed the court they had settled the case and the following exchange occurred: THE COURT: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148940 - 2017-09-21
informed the court they had settled the case and the following exchange occurred: THE COURT: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148940 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of both incidents. In this case, based on these allegations, the State charged Hardaway with two counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
of both incidents. In this case, based on these allegations, the State charged Hardaway with two counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The case was ultimately resolved with a plea agreement. In exchange for Glosson’s guilty plea, the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226347 - 2018-11-01
. The case was ultimately resolved with a plea agreement. In exchange for Glosson’s guilty plea, the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226347 - 2018-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Given the unique facts of this case, claim preclusion does not apply as there is no identity between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212288 - 2018-05-09
. Given the unique facts of this case, claim preclusion does not apply as there is no identity between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212288 - 2018-05-09
State v. Jose Trevino
. However, Trevino argues that § 972.11(2)(b) is unconstitutional as applied in this case in that his Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12630 - 2005-03-31
. However, Trevino argues that § 972.11(2)(b) is unconstitutional as applied in this case in that his Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12630 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the fees claimed. ¶4 In January 2013, the parties agreed to settle the issues in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
of the fees claimed. ¶4 In January 2013, the parties agreed to settle the issues in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court dismissed the case in its entirety, concluding that the doctrine of judicial estoppel barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
, the circuit court dismissed the case in its entirety, concluding that the doctrine of judicial estoppel barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we decide the case on other grounds. See State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159357 - 2017-09-21
we decide the case on other grounds. See State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159357 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jef G. Spalding v. Ammco Tools, Inc.
a great deal of opinions and that ... is one of the aspects of this case. It is apparently going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10643 - 2017-09-20
a great deal of opinions and that ... is one of the aspects of this case. It is apparently going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10643 - 2017-09-20