Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34231 - 34240 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34231 - 34240 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order denying his motion to change the jury’s answers, reiterating his insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32994 - 2008-06-09
appeals an order denying his motion to change the jury’s answers, reiterating his insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32994 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
Tyler Dorbritz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
coverage for damages to” them. ¶5 The parties then filed cross motions for summary judgment. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18136 - 2017-09-21
coverage for damages to” them. ¶5 The parties then filed cross motions for summary judgment. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brad S. Miller
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises two arguments on appeal. First, in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17812 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises two arguments on appeal. First, in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17812 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jessie N. Pearson
Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02),[1] motion for postconviction relief. He argues he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02),[1] motion for postconviction relief. He argues he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raheim Cason
motion. Cason argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in both denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3761 - 2005-03-31
motion. Cason argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in both denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3761 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harris D. Byers
under Wis. Stat. § 980.065. He also appeals an order denying his post-commitment motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
under Wis. Stat. § 980.065. He also appeals an order denying his post-commitment motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion for resentencing or sentence modification.1 For the reasons that follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399770 - 2021-07-28
his postconviction motion for resentencing or sentence modification.1 For the reasons that follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399770 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion seeking either dismissal or a Machner2 hearing. Forbes contends that defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34598 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion seeking either dismissal or a Machner2 hearing. Forbes contends that defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34598 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] The circuit court agreed and granted Northern Bridges’ motion. The court determined that “all the duties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144509 - 2015-07-19
] The circuit court agreed and granted Northern Bridges’ motion. The court determined that “all the duties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144509 - 2015-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the Dennis Trust to secure any ultimately unpaid fees. The court granted the motion. ¶16 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184754 - 2017-09-21
in the Dennis Trust to secure any ultimately unpaid fees. The court granted the motion. ¶16 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184754 - 2017-09-21