Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34231 - 34240 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 34231 - 34240 of 74557 for public records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, this issue was not raised in the trial court, and the record does not establish abuse of prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32345 - 2014-09-15
, this issue was not raised in the trial court, and the record does not establish abuse of prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32345 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the record does not establish abuse of prosecutorial discretion. Finally, Wis. Stat. § 757.30 does not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
, and the record does not establish abuse of prosecutorial discretion. Finally, Wis. Stat. § 757.30 does not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the game” claim that R.S. is the father. After reviewing the record, the court agreed with the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173231 - 2017-09-21
in the game” claim that R.S. is the father. After reviewing the record, the court agreed with the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173231 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
if the record shows that discretion was exercised and a reasonable basis exists for the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71440 - 2011-09-26
if the record shows that discretion was exercised and a reasonable basis exists for the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71440 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was precipitated by the trial court’s order. Echols provides no citation to the record for this contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71440 - 2014-09-15
was precipitated by the trial court’s order. Echols provides no citation to the record for this contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71440 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
citation to the record or to legal authority, that “[o]nce [Evenson] acquired the necessary credentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
citation to the record or to legal authority, that “[o]nce [Evenson] acquired the necessary credentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Jose DeJesus Fuentes
argues that: (1) he was prejudiced by the trial court’s failure to obtain an on-the-record waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12508 - 2017-09-21
argues that: (1) he was prejudiced by the trial court’s failure to obtain an on-the-record waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
of untangling the messy record in order to determine the amount of reasonable attorney fees and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5480 - 2017-09-19
of untangling the messy record in order to determine the amount of reasonable attorney fees and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5480 - 2017-09-19
Faye Lynn Boland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
to fourteen hours examining her medical records. After discussing Boland’s history and the tests he performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16275 - 2005-03-31
to fourteen hours examining her medical records. After discussing Boland’s history and the tests he performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Maldonado
(1982), and “[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination … if the record shows that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11713 - 2005-03-31
(1982), and “[w]e will not reverse a discretionary determination … if the record shows that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11713 - 2005-03-31