Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34241 - 34250 of 44643 for part.
Search results 34241 - 34250 of 44643 for part.
[PDF]
Thomas Jelinski v. Michael Barr
are part of the total evidence available to the trial court. 3 Jelinski testified that he noticed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21
are part of the total evidence available to the trial court. 3 Jelinski testified that he noticed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the prosecution refused to disclose as part of discovery. He also claims entitlement to resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58602 - 2014-09-15
that the prosecution refused to disclose as part of discovery. He also claims entitlement to resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58602 - 2014-09-15
State v. Hector J. Boissonneault
figure. Based in part on these findings, the trial court rejected Boissonneault’s claim that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11748 - 2005-03-31
figure. Based in part on these findings, the trial court rejected Boissonneault’s claim that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11748 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nikola P. Kostich
on P.S.'s appellate issues to earn the full $5000 fee, and by not refunding any part of the fee after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18713 - 2005-06-23
on P.S.'s appellate issues to earn the full $5000 fee, and by not refunding any part of the fee after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18713 - 2005-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
—it is part of the `totality of circumstances' upon which the officer's determination of probable cause must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9210 - 2017-09-19
—it is part of the `totality of circumstances' upon which the officer's determination of probable cause must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but that the court “can’t find a rehabilitative need.” As part of this discussion, the court also considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134447 - 2017-09-21
, but that the court “can’t find a rehabilitative need.” As part of this discussion, the court also considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rendering part of a statute superfluous. Id. We further reasoned in Holy Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
rendering part of a statute superfluous. Id. We further reasoned in Holy Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his sisters and his niece that were not part of his original motion. By order dated October 4, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119568 - 2014-09-15
of his sisters and his niece that were not part of his original motion. By order dated October 4, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
We review the denial of Hooks’s motion to suppress under a two- part standard of review: we uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297407 - 2020-10-20
We review the denial of Hooks’s motion to suppress under a two- part standard of review: we uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297407 - 2020-10-20