Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34251 - 34260 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 34251 - 34260 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297223 - 2020-10-20
report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297223 - 2020-10-20
CA Blank Order
claim. Id., ¶¶39, 48. This level of judicial scrutiny “is deferential to the legislature
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135024 - 2015-02-10
claim. Id., ¶¶39, 48. This level of judicial scrutiny “is deferential to the legislature
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135024 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
Vanessa Henningfield v. Judith Fischer
not contest the respondents’ No(s). 98-3373 2 rights to claim fees, but contends that the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14813 - 2017-09-21
not contest the respondents’ No(s). 98-3373 2 rights to claim fees, but contends that the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict. A claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384910 - 2021-07-08
. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict. A claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384910 - 2021-07-08
State v. Keith A. Rudolph
claims that Rudolph is judicially estopped from challenging a sentence to which he agreed. Rudolph does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26
claims that Rudolph is judicially estopped from challenging a sentence to which he agreed. Rudolph does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Elmer W. VanBoven
Finally, we do not address VanBoven’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated by the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15241 - 2017-09-21
Finally, we do not address VanBoven’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated by the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chad Constantineau
including claims of violations of constitutional rights prior to the plea. See County of Racine v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2584 - 2017-09-19
including claims of violations of constitutional rights prior to the plea. See County of Racine v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2584 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
ineffectiveness claim depends on a favorable suppression ruling: without it he cannot demonstrate prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17824 - 2017-09-21
ineffectiveness claim depends on a favorable suppression ruling: without it he cannot demonstrate prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claimed violations of constitutional rights other than a double jeopardy issue that could be resolved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662618 - 2023-05-31
claimed violations of constitutional rights other than a double jeopardy issue that could be resolved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662618 - 2023-05-31
State v. Ann K. Beglinger
test or chemical test. Defendant does not claim that the results of the field sobriety tests did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8429 - 2005-03-31
test or chemical test. Defendant does not claim that the results of the field sobriety tests did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8429 - 2005-03-31