Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3431 - 3440 of 15281 for 2013.
Search results 3431 - 3440 of 15281 for 2013.
COURT OF APPEALS
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(d) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(d) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 4, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 4, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
in an October 18, 2013 Opinion and Decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, which disbarred Attorney Hooker
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115025 - 2017-09-21
in an October 18, 2013 Opinion and Decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, which disbarred Attorney Hooker
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. ¶2 In September 2013, Ramczyk pled guilty to recklessly endangering safety and possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
affirm. ¶2 In September 2013, Ramczyk pled guilty to recklessly endangering safety and possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by a felon as set forth in Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2)(b) (2013-14).[1] He argues that the complaint against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144391 - 2015-07-13
by a felon as set forth in Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2)(b) (2013-14).[1] He argues that the complaint against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144391 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that on October 11, 2013, at approximately 11:20 p.m., he was dispatched to a residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141752 - 2015-05-13
testified that on October 11, 2013, at approximately 11:20 p.m., he was dispatched to a residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141752 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is offered for an acceptable purpose under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2) (2013-14), 1 such as establishing motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165554 - 2017-09-21
is offered for an acceptable purpose under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2) (2013-14), 1 such as establishing motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The background facts are undisputed. On the night of April 6, 2013, two women fought in the street, while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667119 - 2023-06-13
The background facts are undisputed. On the night of April 6, 2013, two women fought in the street, while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667119 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Miranda when he made the inculpatory statements at issue, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208065 - 2018-02-08
of Miranda when he made the inculpatory statements at issue, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208065 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND Lux was charged with one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168142 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND Lux was charged with one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168142 - 2017-09-21