Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34311 - 34320 of 63759 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] David J. Bley v. Deborah J. Bley
. Roderick, appeals from the judgment of divorce and the order denying her motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ricky L. Sweeney
appeals an order denying his § 974.06, STATS., postconviction motion to vacate his three convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13821 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Terrance L. Meloy, Jr.
of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues relate to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6425 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the matter, the circuit court denied the motion. It subsequently sentenced Shack to fifteen years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190199 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronald L. Bennett v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
was negligent. West Bend filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that Schreiter was an implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9736 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that no grounds exist to challenge the order denying Monahan’s postconviction motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725984 - 2023-11-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. Przybyla argues that he is entitled to resentencing due to an error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213952 - 2018-06-07

[PDF] State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
motion for sentence modification. The state public defender appointed David H. Nispel to represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21

City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
brought a motion to suppress evidence based upon his claim that Mueller did not have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31

Kathryn L. Edgette v. Daniel Kalscheuer
was not settled by the trial court’s letter, because the parties raised the issue again at a pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15103 - 2005-03-31