Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34311 - 34320 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34311 - 34320 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240964 - 2019-05-17
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240964 - 2019-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that “the record conclusively demonstrates that Rodriguez is not entitled to the requested relief” and agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
that “the record conclusively demonstrates that Rodriguez is not entitled to the requested relief” and agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
court independently reviews the record to determine whether the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98529 - 2013-06-25
court independently reviews the record to determine whether the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98529 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue.” See ibid. ¶6 The circuit court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34278 - 2008-10-14
or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue.” See ibid. ¶6 The circuit court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34278 - 2008-10-14
State v. Daniel E. Rohe
not testify at trial and the medical record they prepared was not admitted. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15049 - 2005-03-31
not testify at trial and the medical record they prepared was not admitted. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15049 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Villalobos
On December 15, 1989, Villalobos was arrested and taken into custody by Racine County authorities. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31
On December 15, 1989, Villalobos was arrested and taken into custody by Racine County authorities. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Assessments.” First, the City presented the board’s record which included documentation of the assessor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93890 - 2013-03-12
of the Assessments.” First, the City presented the board’s record which included documentation of the assessor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93890 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800322 - 2024-05-14
, was advised of his right to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800322 - 2024-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
decide the appeals sequentially because the second set of reexaminations was not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27905 - 2007-01-24
decide the appeals sequentially because the second set of reexaminations was not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27905 - 2007-01-24