Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34311 - 34320 of 63789 for records/1000.
Search results 34311 - 34320 of 63789 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record he or she relies on. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69171 - 2014-09-15
of the record he or she relies on. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69171 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joseph P. LaPere v. June Gengler
was found guilty and to expunge the conduct report from his record. ¶5 On September 16, 1997, LaPere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15356 - 2017-09-21
was found guilty and to expunge the conduct report from his record. ¶5 On September 16, 1997, LaPere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15356 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
). If the trial court’s decision is supported by the record, we will not reverse even though the court may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62727 - 2014-09-15
). If the trial court’s decision is supported by the record, we will not reverse even though the court may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62727 - 2014-09-15
State v. Arthur Richard Edwards
(Ct. App. 1982). When we review a discretionary decision, we examine the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11371 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1982). When we review a discretionary decision, we examine the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11371 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Walters
explaining its reason for appointing standby counsel. Because the record supports the State's position, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31
explaining its reason for appointing standby counsel. Because the record supports the State's position, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was truly undisputed (Robert provided no record citations for this assertion), and, if so, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213226 - 2018-05-22
was truly undisputed (Robert provided no record citations for this assertion), and, if so, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213226 - 2018-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record, which omissions violate the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187288 - 2017-09-21
to the record, which omissions violate the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was fully explained on the record. The court allowed Goeman to testify, but prevented him from testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210103 - 2018-04-18
was fully explained on the record. The court allowed Goeman to testify, but prevented him from testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210103 - 2018-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record suggests that A.M.N. is correct on this point, I do not address this additional time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
the record suggests that A.M.N. is correct on this point, I do not address this additional time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
State v. Montgomery P. Avant
”; or (3) “if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.” 54 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31
”; or (3) “if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.” 54 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31