Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34361 - 34370 of 65339 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34361 - 34370 of 65339 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232846 - 2019-01-14
for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232846 - 2019-01-14
Ed Cody, Jr. v. Michael Weygandt
, considering whether the court reasonably applied the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See Schmid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20084 - 2005-07-25
, considering whether the court reasonably applied the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See Schmid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20084 - 2005-07-25
State v. Randy D. Dziczkowski
and that it incorrectly applied the law. Because the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12996 - 2005-03-31
and that it incorrectly applied the law. Because the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12996 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33016 - 2008-10-25
will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33016 - 2008-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Dennis E. Jones
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12203 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12203 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
doubt because the record supports the trial court’s assertion that the defunct guidelines did not affect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
doubt because the record supports the trial court’s assertion that the defunct guidelines did not affect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the record, this court summarily affirmed the convictions. See id. at 3. The supreme court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30086 - 2014-09-15
and the record, this court summarily affirmed the convictions. See id. at 3. The supreme court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121730 - 2014-09-17
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121730 - 2014-09-17