Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34371 - 34380 of 36261 for e's.
Search results 34371 - 34380 of 36261 for e's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“[E]xpert opinion regarding a victim’s recantation in domestic abuse cases is permissible.”).8 ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
) (“[E]xpert opinion regarding a victim’s recantation in domestic abuse cases is permissible.”).8 ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Paul D. Hoppe
or threatened, “[e]xcept for the initial request to withhold the first … medication … no threat to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2802 - 2017-09-19
or threatened, “[e]xcept for the initial request to withhold the first … medication … no threat to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2802 - 2017-09-19
Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
curiae brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Lorraine C. Stoltzfus, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
curiae brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Lorraine C. Stoltzfus, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31
State v. Otis B. Bledsoe
findings or the subject matter of her testimony pursuant to § 971.23(1)(e). ¶14 Although we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2711 - 2005-03-31
findings or the subject matter of her testimony pursuant to § 971.23(1)(e). ¶14 Although we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2711 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley
by Daniel J. O’Brien, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17389 - 2005-03-31
by Daniel J. O’Brien, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17389 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the respondent-appellant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17329 - 2005-03-31
, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the respondent-appellant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17329 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andre L. Avery
that the trial court’s credibly finding was clearly erroneous. E. Postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25530 - 2006-06-19
that the trial court’s credibly finding was clearly erroneous. E. Postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25530 - 2006-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion ignores longstanding statutory law. Wis. Stat. § 805.14[5](e) states: It is not necessary to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90099 - 2012-12-05
conclusion ignores longstanding statutory law. Wis. Stat. § 805.14[5](e) states: It is not necessary to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90099 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Otis B. Bledsoe
pursuant to § 971.23(1)(e). ¶14 Although we conclude that the prosecutor should have identified Flahive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2711 - 2017-09-19
pursuant to § 971.23(1)(e). ¶14 Although we conclude that the prosecutor should have identified Flahive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2711 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 134
County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89584 - 2014-09-15
County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89584 - 2014-09-15