Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34381 - 34390 of 72395 for alle.
Search results 34381 - 34390 of 72395 for alle.
State v. Jose M. Jaimes
], I turned to—to defendant’s attention and I asked him if it [the cocaine] was all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24796 - 2006-05-30
], I turned to—to defendant’s attention and I asked him if it [the cocaine] was all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24796 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
all the circumstances of the case, including the seriousness of the probable consequences.” Id. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93187 - 2013-02-20
all the circumstances of the case, including the seriousness of the probable consequences.” Id. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93187 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2017-18). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254344 - 2020-02-19
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2017-18). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254344 - 2020-02-19
[PDF]
State v. William F. Hughes
in violation of § 947.01, STATS., all as a repeater under § 939.62(1)(a), STATS.. The complaint alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14058 - 2014-09-15
in violation of § 947.01, STATS., all as a repeater under § 939.62(1)(a), STATS.. The complaint alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wesley Michael Lund
for 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7335 - 2017-09-20
for 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7335 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael Brandt
agreed 2 All further references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1995-96
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17268 - 2017-09-21
agreed 2 All further references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1995-96
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17268 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, referring to other incidents that were investigated, not all of which were charged. It explained precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2008-10-20
, referring to other incidents that were investigated, not all of which were charged. It explained precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
Raymond Booker v. David Schwarz
of Booker’s probation states: “You shall avoid all conduct which is in violation of federal or state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6089 - 2017-09-19
of Booker’s probation states: “You shall avoid all conduct which is in violation of federal or state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6089 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Brown
to the 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6527 - 2017-09-19
to the 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6527 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
on the record his reasons for denying the postconviction motion on all bases. He reaffirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12747 - 2017-09-21
on the record his reasons for denying the postconviction motion on all bases. He reaffirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12747 - 2017-09-21