Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34381 - 34390 of 97666 for court records search online.
Search results 34381 - 34390 of 97666 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. David C. Liebnitz
, including the sentence recommendation, for the record. Liebnitz, in response to the circuit court judge’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17417 - 2017-09-21
, including the sentence recommendation, for the record. Liebnitz, in response to the circuit court judge’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17417 - 2017-09-21
State v. David C. Liebnitz
, for the record. Liebnitz, in response to the circuit court judge’s inquiry, stated that he joined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2005-03-31
, for the record. Liebnitz, in response to the circuit court judge’s inquiry, stated that he joined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and unsealing the case record. We conclude the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
and unsealing the case record. We conclude the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation
to explain its decision, we may review the record to determine whether it supports the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10308 - 2017-09-20
to explain its decision, we may review the record to determine whether it supports the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10308 - 2017-09-20
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation
to the untimeliness of the demand. The record shows that the court did not tell Merten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
to the untimeliness of the demand. The record shows that the court did not tell Merten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
with the valuation methodology, we examine the record to determine if the trial court considered the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31
with the valuation methodology, we examine the record to determine if the trial court considered the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
with the valuation methodology, we examine the record to determine if the trial court considered the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14064 - 2014-09-15
with the valuation methodology, we examine the record to determine if the trial court considered the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14064 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the existing record. First, the circuit court did not make factual findings that Natalie incurred all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21
on the existing record. First, the circuit court did not make factual findings that Natalie incurred all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record does not show that the circuit court was imposing additional punishment for accepting this plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534059 - 2022-06-22
. The record does not show that the circuit court was imposing additional punishment for accepting this plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534059 - 2022-06-22
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
). When reviewing findings of fact, we look to the record for evidence to support the court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31
). When reviewing findings of fact, we look to the record for evidence to support the court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31