Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Eric S. Fenz
partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
and the court’s order partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4013 - 2017-09-20
and the court’s order partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4013 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. Tolonen argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22
motion for postconviction relief. Tolonen argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22
State v. Eric S. Fenz
partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4012 - 2005-03-31
partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4012 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric S. Fenz
partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4013 - 2005-03-31
partially denying his motion for sentence modification. Fenz argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4013 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Anderson
and from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Anderson offers numerous arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7145 - 2017-09-20
and from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Anderson offers numerous arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7145 - 2017-09-20
State v. Edward D. Anderson
-02),[1] and from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Anderson offers numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7145 - 2005-09-02
-02),[1] and from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Anderson offers numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7145 - 2005-09-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
summarily denying his motions for resentencing.1 The issues are whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29781 - 2014-09-15
summarily denying his motions for resentencing.1 The issues are whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29781 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals from an order that denied his most recent postconviction motion seeking additional credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676540 - 2023-07-06
, appeals from an order that denied his most recent postconviction motion seeking additional credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676540 - 2023-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motions for resentencing.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
denying his motions for resentencing.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23