Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 15539 for fee.

State v. Cheryl L. Welsch
assessed the fees as mandatory ministerial costs.[5] After the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9268 - 2005-03-31

State Bank of Cross Plains v. Douglas J. Garavalia
contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for attorney fees under Wis. Stat. § 425.308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25276 - 2006-05-24

Patti Jo Hendricks v. Gregory A. Thieme
, and orders Thieme to pay a portion of Hendricks’ attorney fees for “over-litigating.” Thieme also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21213 - 2006-02-06

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader
require Attorney Tjader to reimburse a client for interest on the delayed refund of an attorney fee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Roberta K. Long v. Russell S. Long
to regular income earned from employment in 1993, Russell received an $11,700 bonus, and consulting fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8136 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State Bank of Cross Plains v. Douglas J. Garavalia
. He contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for attorney fees under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25276 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patti Jo Hendricks v. Gregory A. Thieme
a portion of Hendricks’ attorney fees for “over-litigating.” Thieme also claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21213 - 2017-09-21

Roberta K. Long v. Russell S. Long
, and consulting fees of $12,000. He also received $2,460.32 in 1992 for services performed as a bankruptcy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8136 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary A. Klovers v. City of Beaver Dam
-0493 2 pay attorney’s fees to Klovers. We reverse as to the assessment, but affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3640 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Cheryl L. Welsch
was improper. The State responds that the trial court properly assessed the fees as mandatory ministerial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9268 - 2017-09-19