Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 17693 for my.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 17693 for my.
State v. Stacy D. Davis
interchange, he held a wine bottle near her face “like he was going to smash it into my face.” After more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3403 - 2005-03-31
interchange, he held a wine bottle near her face “like he was going to smash it into my face.” After more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen R. Stocki
my options were as far as that went, and I wanted more information.” He could not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21
my options were as far as that went, and I wanted more information.” He could not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is my professional psychiatric opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51755 - 2010-07-06
is my professional psychiatric opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51755 - 2010-07-06
State v. Rick E. Norem
to get the sexual offender treatment, and that in my opinion is ten years. The court also specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
to get the sexual offender treatment, and that in my opinion is ten years. The court also specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was understanding me because his responses to my questions were appropriate. They were logical. He was asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109495 - 2017-09-21
was understanding me because his responses to my questions were appropriate. They were logical. He was asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109495 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the plea hearing: Mr. Seymour [Wappler’s counsel]: My client will be entering a plea to the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15
at the plea hearing: Mr. Seymour [Wappler’s counsel]: My client will be entering a plea to the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 43
with a variation of “After you my dear Alphonse,” or “You first my dear Gaston,” and continues with each character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47046 - 2014-09-15
with a variation of “After you my dear Alphonse,” or “You first my dear Gaston,” and continues with each character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47046 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anquion Johnson
in camera. The trial court denied the defense request, concluding: I found nothing which would in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8884 - 2005-03-31
in camera. The trial court denied the defense request, concluding: I found nothing which would in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8884 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
then stated, “With respect to the newest questions, I think my answer to the jury on that is basically that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64357 - 2011-05-16
then stated, “With respect to the newest questions, I think my answer to the jury on that is basically that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64357 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
a similar examination of Mr. Ali in 2005. Despite my review this year of additional police records that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31305 - 2014-09-15
a similar examination of Mr. Ali in 2005. Despite my review this year of additional police records that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31305 - 2014-09-15