Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 63511 for records.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 63511 for records.
CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McToy filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103117 - 2013-10-22
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McToy filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103117 - 2013-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174723 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174723 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415320 - 2021-08-25
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415320 - 2021-08-25
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116148 - 2014-07-08
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116148 - 2014-07-08
State v. David T.O.
to the charges, but denied the State's petition for waiving David into adult court because he had no prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
to the charges, but denied the State's petition for waiving David into adult court because he had no prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166971 - 2017-09-21
2 record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166971 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146239 - 2015-08-18
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146239 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29