Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34411 - 34420 of 39869 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 34411 - 34420 of 39869 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Scott W. Nagel
to negate his statements and rebut his claim of accidental injury. ¶10 With respect to the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19
to negate his statements and rebut his claim of accidental injury. ¶10 With respect to the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 239 N.W.2d 97 (1976) (“Arguments or statements made by counsel during argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137262 - 2017-09-21
, 239 N.W.2d 97 (1976) (“Arguments or statements made by counsel during argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Melton
to it. That information included the prosecutor’s statements to the trial court, including Melton’s lengthy criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21
to it. That information included the prosecutor’s statements to the trial court, including Melton’s lengthy criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
knowledge and accumulated life experiences. Consistently, we conclude that the juror's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10929 - 2017-09-20
knowledge and accumulated life experiences. Consistently, we conclude that the juror's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10929 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing—as well as its additional statements in its written order—demonstrate that it complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112199 - 2017-09-21
at sentencing—as well as its additional statements in its written order—demonstrate that it complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112199 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leonard A. Sarnowski
explaining the finding, the trial court recognized that it was presented with “competing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7371 - 2005-03-31
explaining the finding, the trial court recognized that it was presented with “competing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7371 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
statement by the court that was not made at the sentencing hearing: “I appreciate that the state takes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
statement by the court that was not made at the sentencing hearing: “I appreciate that the state takes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is this statement conclusory, but, similar to his other arguments, Curtis also fails to analyze his arrest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238427 - 2019-04-02
is this statement conclusory, but, similar to his other arguments, Curtis also fails to analyze his arrest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238427 - 2019-04-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
of all statements made during this hearing. The record does not indicate why Stacy did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55242 - 2014-09-15
of all statements made during this hearing. The record does not indicate why Stacy did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55242 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
statements made during this hearing. The record does not indicate why Stacy did not appear in person. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06
statements made during this hearing. The record does not indicate why Stacy did not appear in person. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06