Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34421 - 34430 of 91587 for 1.
Search results 34421 - 34430 of 91587 for 1.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J. 1 Noah Sanders appeals a judgment convicting him of four misdemeanors: two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189521 - 2017-09-21
. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J. 1 Noah Sanders appeals a judgment convicting him of four misdemeanors: two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189521 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 142
: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge.[1] Reversed and cause remanded. Before Fine, Curley and Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28883 - 2007-06-26
: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge.[1] Reversed and cause remanded. Before Fine, Curley and Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28883 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2019AP1062 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Suhs and his minor daughter, Megan Suhs, (collectively, “Suhs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265289 - 2020-06-23
). No. 2019AP1062 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Suhs and his minor daughter, Megan Suhs, (collectively, “Suhs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265289 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Charles Dante Higgs
basis for his plea of no contest to the reduced charge of misdemeanor battery, was deficient. 1 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
basis for his plea of no contest to the reduced charge of misdemeanor battery, was deficient. 1 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
., Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. Nathaniel A. Lindell appeals his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16114 - 2005-03-31
., Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. Nathaniel A. Lindell appeals his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16114 - 2005-03-31
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
reprimanded. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164384 - 2017-09-21
reprimanded. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. No. 2013AP210 2 ¶1 SHERMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105816 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. No. 2013AP210 2 ¶1 SHERMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
FRANKE, Judges. Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Dontrell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
FRANKE, Judges. Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Dontrell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Fine, Kessler and Neubauer, JJ. ¶1 KESSLER, J. The Mark S. Glazer and Barbara E. Glazer Trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86341 - 2014-09-15
. Before Fine, Kessler and Neubauer, JJ. ¶1 KESSLER, J. The Mark S. Glazer and Barbara E. Glazer Trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86341 - 2014-09-15

