Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34421 - 34430 of 83493 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34421 - 34430 of 83493 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District ...
2014 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136273 - 2015-02-24
2014 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136273 - 2015-02-24
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a petition by entering a no contest plea, as in this case, the court nevertheless “shall hear testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
in a petition by entering a no contest plea, as in this case, the court nevertheless “shall hear testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
State v. Mario D. Harrell
reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549, 554, 518 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5198 - 2017-09-19
reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549, 554, 518 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5198 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
, the County was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17747 - 2017-09-21
, the County was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17747 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
rights to Angellika were terminated. DISCUSSION ¶4 The question presented in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37587 - 2009-07-13
rights to Angellika were terminated. DISCUSSION ¶4 The question presented in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37587 - 2009-07-13
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
, a potential witness against him. Subsequently, on two occasions, Taylor contacted Hogan and in each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14171 - 2005-03-31
, a potential witness against him. Subsequently, on two occasions, Taylor contacted Hogan and in each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Orbbie Williams
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101575 - 2013-09-03
to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101575 - 2013-09-03