Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34431 - 34440 of 83493 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34431 - 34440 of 83493 for case codes/1000.
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
, a potential witness against him. Subsequently, on two occasions, Taylor contacted Hogan and in each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14171 - 2005-03-31
, a potential witness against him. Subsequently, on two occasions, Taylor contacted Hogan and in each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Orbbie Williams
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101575 - 2013-09-03
to determine whether they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101575 - 2013-09-03
State v. John R. Calkins
may not collaterally attack a prior conviction in a subsequent criminal case where the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
may not collaterally attack a prior conviction in a subsequent criminal case where the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the case involving his sister.2 Tousignant’s probation in the present case was then revoked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460916 - 2021-12-07
in the case involving his sister.2 Tousignant’s probation in the present case was then revoked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460916 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case was due primarily to (1) the unavailability of a state witness; and (2) the fact that Whitelow’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21
the case was due primarily to (1) the unavailability of a state witness; and (2) the fact that Whitelow’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of LaCrosse v. G. Bradford Merkl
his case was called, he stated that he wished to have a trial before a jury because he had paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9149 - 2017-09-19
his case was called, he stated that he wished to have a trial before a jury because he had paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cottonseed, LLC v. Brian Coulthard
its policy with Riley Cotton under the circumstances of this case. Riley Cotton then filed a cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26097 - 2017-09-21
its policy with Riley Cotton under the circumstances of this case. Riley Cotton then filed a cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26097 - 2017-09-21
Alvar Larson v. City of Elkhorn
be considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary to law had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
be considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary to law had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Torrey Y.
in damage under the facts of this case. We disagree. We affirm the restitution order. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14836 - 2005-03-31
in damage under the facts of this case. We disagree. We affirm the restitution order. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14836 - 2005-03-31