Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34441 - 34450 of 57502 for a i x.
Search results 34441 - 34450 of 57502 for a i x.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the applicable law de novo. Id. ¶11 “[I]t is reasonable and consistent with Fourth Amendment protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
to the applicable law de novo. Id. ¶11 “[I]t is reasonable and consistent with Fourth Amendment protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
had some difficulty articulating his consonants. And when I asked for his license, then he had some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134547 - 2015-02-10
had some difficulty articulating his consonants. And when I asked for his license, then he had some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134547 - 2015-02-10
State v. Maurice S. Ewing
to the defendant, the defendant doesn’t say, no last night I was moving.” The prosecutor also said, “The next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19333 - 2005-09-19
to the defendant, the defendant doesn’t say, no last night I was moving.” The prosecutor also said, “The next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19333 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also something that I consider.” And in its written decision, the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
also something that I consider.” And in its written decision, the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
)(i), which requires reference to the parties by name, rather than by party designation. Peterson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52587 - 2014-09-15
)(i), which requires reference to the parties by name, rather than by party designation. Peterson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael Bartz
-CR -8- excessive. In argument to the court, postconviction counsel said, “And I would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19
-CR -8- excessive. In argument to the court, postconviction counsel said, “And I would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19
James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
his land: When I would inspect the property after the saplings had grown up to a point where it wasn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5883 - 2005-03-31
his land: When I would inspect the property after the saplings had grown up to a point where it wasn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
the trial court stated: As I was listening to the comments today trying to gauge that sentence as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
the trial court stated: As I was listening to the comments today trying to gauge that sentence as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Pekay Speciality Contracting v. Madson Tiling & Excavating, Inc.
times about the care that needed to be taken so as not to damage the sheets. Their bill was $2600. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12812 - 2017-09-21
times about the care that needed to be taken so as not to damage the sheets. Their bill was $2600. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12812 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2013AP2515 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF2920 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06
. Appeal No. 2013AP2515 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF2920 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06