Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34451 - 34460 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34451 - 34460 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as applied in violation of the separation of powers because the executive branch is defending the case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977445 - 2025-07-01
as applied in violation of the separation of powers because the executive branch is defending the case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977445 - 2025-07-01
State v. Joseph S. Upright
that the facts of his case are different from the Phillips case relied on by the circuit court. In Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6996 - 2005-03-31
that the facts of his case are different from the Phillips case relied on by the circuit court. In Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6996 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” or “the School District.” No. 2015AP2447 2 immunity apply to the facts of this case. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174363 - 2017-09-21
” or “the School District.” No. 2015AP2447 2 immunity apply to the facts of this case. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174363 - 2017-09-21
State v. D.L.S.
in attempting to prove this case.” The second statement, made during closing arguments as the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
in attempting to prove this case.” The second statement, made during closing arguments as the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark S. Mielke
2002 WI App 251 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3116-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4616 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 251 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3116-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4616 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul H. Gates
, stop a person for investigative purposes in cases where he or she may be said to have an "articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
, stop a person for investigative purposes in cases where he or she may be said to have an "articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54236 - 2014-09-15
William E. Johnson v. Donna M. Johnson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2961
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13119 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2961
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13119 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
of his trial. He even concedes that because Jodie W. was not yet law at the time his case was decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
of his trial. He even concedes that because Jodie W. was not yet law at the time his case was decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19