Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34451 - 34460 of 42133 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 34451 - 34460 of 42133 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
disagree. The alternative scenarios the circuit court ran on the computer program fulfilled its duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34289 - 2014-09-15
disagree. The alternative scenarios the circuit court ran on the computer program fulfilled its duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34289 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that on August 20, 2010, he was on patrol duty in Calumet County. At approximately 9:40 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
testified that on August 20, 2010, he was on patrol duty in Calumet County. At approximately 9:40 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Nos. 2020AP498-CR 2020AP499-CR 2020AP500-CR 2020AP501-CR 4 court-mandated duty; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397478 - 2021-07-27
. Nos. 2020AP498-CR 2020AP499-CR 2020AP500-CR 2020AP501-CR 4 court-mandated duty; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397478 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court found Durante performed his duties in a neutral and independent manner and provided a PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189103 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court found Durante performed his duties in a neutral and independent manner and provided a PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶27 Germania contends that the circuit court: (1) ignored STIR’s duty to mitigate damages; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432281 - 2021-09-28
). ¶27 Germania contends that the circuit court: (1) ignored STIR’s duty to mitigate damages; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432281 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of an attorney whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144546 - 2017-09-21
comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of an attorney whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cooperation was not evidence within the State’s “possession.” The State had no duty to discern, much less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481776 - 2022-02-08
cooperation was not evidence within the State’s “possession.” The State had no duty to discern, much less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481776 - 2022-02-08
City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
by either party at the motion hearing held on October 4, 2001. Restivo testified that while on duty on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
by either party at the motion hearing held on October 4, 2001. Restivo testified that while on duty on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
State v. Howard D. Platt
, not the State, has a duty to show why he needed the information under § 343.305(4m) to make an informed decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31
, not the State, has a duty to show why he needed the information under § 343.305(4m) to make an informed decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
). However, the duties of an advocate are limited and general in nature. State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
). However, the duties of an advocate are limited and general in nature. State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27