Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34461 - 34470 of 69114 for he.
Search results 34461 - 34470 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Arpke
-1239-FT 2 consent law. Arpke’s license was also suspended under § 343.305(7). He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2579 - 2017-09-19
-1239-FT 2 consent law. Arpke’s license was also suspended under § 343.305(7). He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, he responded to it, and counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181429 - 2017-09-21
of the report, he responded to it, and counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Blaedow. He has also appealed from No. 2005AP2160 2 a separate order entered on the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26877 - 2014-09-15
Blaedow. He has also appealed from No. 2005AP2160 2 a separate order entered on the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26877 - 2014-09-15
Richard J. Nichols v. Patrick J. Conlin
conclude that Nichols was not entitled to a just cause hearing because: (1) he served at “the pleasure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9786 - 2005-03-31
conclude that Nichols was not entitled to a just cause hearing because: (1) he served at “the pleasure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). In June 2022, Thompson filed the pro se postconviction motion underlying this appeal. First, he alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
). In June 2022, Thompson filed the pro se postconviction motion underlying this appeal. First, he alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Wehinger provided the court with a signed plea questionnaire. Wehinger indicated to the court that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133769 - 2017-09-21
, Wehinger provided the court with a signed plea questionnaire. Wehinger indicated to the court that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133769 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it. ¶5 Keuken was convicted by the jury on all three citations. However, he is not appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22
it. ¶5 Keuken was convicted by the jury on all three citations. However, he is not appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Roger Garcia appeals a conviction for possession of child pornography. He argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85590 - 2012-07-30
CURIAM. Roger Garcia appeals a conviction for possession of child pornography. He argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85590 - 2012-07-30
Rodosbaldo Pozo v. Sheriff Karl Halverson
of a controlled substance without a tax stamp, and he was sentenced to thirty-three years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12268 - 2005-03-31
of a controlled substance without a tax stamp, and he was sentenced to thirty-three years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12268 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
each and every legal proceeding was not true.” He asserts that testing showed him with a seventh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
each and every legal proceeding was not true.” He asserts that testing showed him with a seventh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21