Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34461 - 34470 of 83814 for simple case search.
Search results 34461 - 34470 of 83814 for simple case search.
State v. Donna M. Trautman
of sentencing discretion. She argues that the circumstances of her case mandate a more lenient sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5507 - 2005-03-31
of sentencing discretion. She argues that the circumstances of her case mandate a more lenient sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5507 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is insufficient to make this determination and therefore remand the case for additional fact-finding. Statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30875 - 2007-11-14
is insufficient to make this determination and therefore remand the case for additional fact-finding. Statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30875 - 2007-11-14
State v. Keith M. Carey
2004 WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1578-CR 03-1579
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6587 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1578-CR 03-1579
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6587 - 2005-03-31
Thomas M.P. v. Kimberly J.L.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10512 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the case as a whole, multiplying those hours by an hourly rate of $250.00, and adding in other expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
on the case as a whole, multiplying those hours by an hourly rate of $250.00, and adding in other expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case using a pseudonym. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86. No. 2021AP1907-CR 3 home with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631423 - 2023-03-14
in this case using a pseudonym. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86. No. 2021AP1907-CR 3 home with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631423 - 2023-03-14
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Snyder
2001 WI 17 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 01-0387-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16478 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI 17 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 01-0387-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
. No. 01-1968 2 claims: (1) the law of the case doctrine precluded a subsequent trial court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
. No. 01-1968 2 claims: (1) the law of the case doctrine precluded a subsequent trial court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case or release Swims when the victim did not appear at the first scheduled trial date, (5) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132980 - 2017-09-21
the case or release Swims when the victim did not appear at the first scheduled trial date, (5) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132980 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
prosecutorial vindictiveness in this case. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s conclusion that Williamson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
prosecutorial vindictiveness in this case. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s conclusion that Williamson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31