Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34471 - 34480 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34471 - 34480 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Certification
this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea? BACKGROUND In three separate cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133320 - 2015-01-20
this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea? BACKGROUND In three separate cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133320 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that in cases like this I have to sentence him to five years [of] initial confinement unless I can find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82919 - 2014-09-15
that in cases like this I have to sentence him to five years [of] initial confinement unless I can find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82919 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Edmund J. Krawcyzk v. Bank of Sun Prairie
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 95-0249, 95-1298 For Complete Title †Petition to Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9037 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 95-0249, 95-1298 For Complete Title †Petition to Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9037 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
assault case wanted to be excused early on the first day of the first trial date. Cardoza objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
assault case wanted to be excused early on the first day of the first trial date. Cardoza objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the minimum period of confinement under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(cm) was available in his case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422426 - 2021-09-08
the minimum period of confinement under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(cm) was available in his case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422426 - 2021-09-08
UFE, Inc v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
in this case is whether Wis. Stat. § 102.42(2)(a) (1993-94),[1] a section of the Worker's Compensation Act
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16956 - 2005-03-31
in this case is whether Wis. Stat. § 102.42(2)(a) (1993-94),[1] a section of the Worker's Compensation Act
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and sentencing hearing in the solicitation case. Dahlk pled no contest to one of the charges, concerning his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433136 - 2021-09-30
and sentencing hearing in the solicitation case. Dahlk pled no contest to one of the charges, concerning his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433136 - 2021-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 948.02(2) are identical to the version in effect at the time of the offense in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246825 - 2019-09-19
. STAT. § 948.02(2) are identical to the version in effect at the time of the offense in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246825 - 2019-09-19
[PDF]
postconviction motion was similar to an argument that was being advanced in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755443 - 2024-01-30
postconviction motion was similar to an argument that was being advanced in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755443 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and (4) the combined effect of the asserted errors in his case prejudiced his defense. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122463 - 2014-09-25
, and (4) the combined effect of the asserted errors in his case prejudiced his defense. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122463 - 2014-09-25