Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34481 - 34490 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
consider Luke’s testimony, which is clear from the court’s statement during its oral ruling that Luke’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007350 - 2025-09-10

State v. Kenyon H.
that Kenyon’s statements to the police, upon which the allegations in the petition were largely based, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5351 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
best interest. This is a correct statement of law. The court carefully considered the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6331 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
best interest. This is a correct statement of law. The court carefully considered the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6332 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
statements he made to police. Denial of Madsen’s motion for a change of venue ¶12 Madsen moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60305 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David Vigil
a review of the entire record, including the sentencing record as well as defense counsel’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7435 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Rusk County Citizen Action Group, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
conclude that § 144.82 is only a statement of purpose and not a grant of authority to issue a ban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9954 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
credit card statement and a receipt. Kristine testified that she requested repayment on all three loans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59065 - 2011-01-18

COURT OF APPEALS
acts, words and statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30

State v. Donald Mentzel
probation is a sentence. See id. It agreed with the court’s statement in Smith v. United States, 505 F.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31