Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34481 - 34490 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 34481 - 34490 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Carol J.R. v. County of Milwaukee
. The facts are undisputed. On October 26, 1993, the trial court committed Carol J. R. to the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7801 - 2005-03-31
. The facts are undisputed. On October 26, 1993, the trial court committed Carol J. R. to the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7801 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postcommitment relief. Schmidt contends that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89022 - 2012-11-06
for postcommitment relief. Schmidt contends that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89022 - 2012-11-06
State v. Brian K. John
. John was sentenced to concurrent terms totaling eighteen years in prison. John argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15151 - 2005-03-31
. John was sentenced to concurrent terms totaling eighteen years in prison. John argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David G. Alexander
5 ¶9 The defendant also testified at the trial. His testimony materially conflicted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17134 - 2017-09-21
5 ¶9 The defendant also testified at the trial. His testimony materially conflicted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17134 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
methods of treatment or diagnosis standard of care evidence at trial? Does Miller v. Kim supply
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259913 - 2020-05-05
methods of treatment or diagnosis standard of care evidence at trial? Does Miller v. Kim supply
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259913 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decision in case no. 2013AP2316-CR
prejudicial comments made by plaintiffs’ counsel during closing argument require a new trial? Under all
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170047 - 2017-09-21
prejudicial comments made by plaintiffs’ counsel during closing argument require a new trial? Under all
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170047 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
by plaintiffs’ counsel during closing argument require a new trial? Under all of the circumstances, do
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169401 - 2017-09-21
by plaintiffs’ counsel during closing argument require a new trial? Under all of the circumstances, do
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Synopsis of cases being heard in oral argument, April 2020
to postconviction counsel’s alleged failure to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. In State
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsapr2020.pdf - 2020-04-15
to postconviction counsel’s alleged failure to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. In State
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsapr2020.pdf - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2011
an orthodontics practice. At the divorce trial, the parties disputed the value of the orthodontics business
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62776 - 2014-09-15
an orthodontics practice. At the divorce trial, the parties disputed the value of the orthodontics business
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62776 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2020
to postconviction counsel’s alleged failure to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. In State
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258165 - 2020-04-15
to postconviction counsel’s alleged failure to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. In State
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258165 - 2020-04-15