Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 69366 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
allegations, Giegler’s parole was revoked, and he returned to prison. He subsequently pled guilty to two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04
allegations, Giegler’s parole was revoked, and he returned to prison. He subsequently pled guilty to two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. James M. Baldauf
that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered because he appeared pro se and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5079 - 2017-09-19
that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered because he appeared pro se and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5079 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
drug possession charges and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore argues he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38346 - 2014-09-15
drug possession charges and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore argues he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38346 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harold W. Zastrow
an evidentiary hearing. Zastrow has a heart condition which he claims was unknown at the time of sentencing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2727 - 2005-03-31
an evidentiary hearing. Zastrow has a heart condition which he claims was unknown at the time of sentencing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darryl Wimbish Jones
of conviction for extortion and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6545 - 2017-09-19
of conviction for extortion and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6545 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Ripon v. Bruce M. Briskie
Fredin testified that at 11:00 p.m. on December 20, 2001, he was on general patrol when he heard “a lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5868 - 2017-09-19
Fredin testified that at 11:00 p.m. on December 20, 2001, he was on general patrol when he heard “a lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5868 - 2017-09-19
William Pangman v.
in the course of post-divorce proceedings in which he was a party and from the referee’s recommendation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17079 - 2005-03-31
in the course of post-divorce proceedings in which he was a party and from the referee’s recommendation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17079 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and 941.29(2)(a) (2003-04).2 He also appeals the orders denying his postconviction motions. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15
, and 941.29(2)(a) (2003-04).2 He also appeals the orders denying his postconviction motions. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
to nominate him to another term on the commission. He claimed that he had a "binding contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
to nominate him to another term on the commission. He claimed that he had a "binding contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(2), 939.05, and 941.29(2)(a) (2003-04).[2] He also appeals the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(2), 939.05, and 941.29(2)(a) (2003-04).[2] He also appeals the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06