Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 30014 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, but we review its legal conclusions de novo. See Citation Partners, LLC v. DOR, 2023 WI 16, ¶8, 406
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681362 - 2023-07-25

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey O. Bates
that we review de novo. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). ¶6 Bates Sr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4828 - 2017-09-19

Pekay Speciality Contracting v. Madson Tiling & Excavating, Inc.
of summary judgment dismissing its complaint based on claim preclusion. We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12812 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Citifinancial, Inc. v. Samantha Lee Curtis
¶6 We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6019 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Madison v. Ray A. Peterson
and sought a trial de novo in the circuit court. The circuit court also found him guilty and Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2255 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Christopher Walker
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8817 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Shirlene Davis
that we resolve de novo. See State v. Eason, 2000 WI App 73 ¶ 3, 234 Wis. 2d 396, 398, 610 N.W.2d 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16037 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
review a claimed violation of this right de novo. Ibid. To prevail, the defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32811 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Donald Kaltenbach
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3020 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a restitution order comports with the statute, however, is subject to our de novo review.” State v. Rash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165726 - 2017-09-21